#Brave browser review location hiding code

#Brave browser review location hiding code

By contrast Chrome, Firefox and Safari tagged telemetry data with identifiers linked to each browser instance.īrave has removed a ton of Google code from its version of Chromium to improve user privacy and has also come out hard against Google's FLoC ID proposal, which is beginning to roll out to Chrome users but will not been enabled in Brave.īrave has several privacy-enhancing settings with options to block third-party ad trackers, a toggle for upgrading unsecured connections to HTTPS, cookie blocking and fingerprinting blocking.

Brave did not use any identifiers allowing the IP addresses to be tracked over time, and did not share details of web pages visited with its backend servers. Leith looked at how much browsers communicate to each browser maker's backend servers.

Leith at Trinity College at the University of Dublin rated Brave as the most private browser over Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, and Chromium-based Microsoft Edge. Still, a recent study by Professor Douglas J. Eich in 2020 apologized to customers after being caught sharing default autocomplete answers with an affiliate cryptocurrency exchange. The Chromium-based browser is headed up by Brendan Eich, a key designer of the JavaScript programming language and a co-founder of Mozilla and Firefox.īrave's privacy record isn't unblemished. It also recently acquired Tailcat to launch Brave Search, so it can provide a privacy-focussed alternative to Google Chrome and Google Search. Brave in January announced it had passed 50 million monthly active users, which is still a fraction of Chrome's 3.3 billion users across desktop and mobile.īrave's business model relies on privacy-protecting ads that can pay publishers and users with Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) when users pay attention to ads. Closeįeatures: Chromium-based | Blocks third-party ad trackers | Blocks cookiesīrave is a Chromium-based browser that by default blocks ads, fingerprinting and ad-trackers. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping.